Fast Food Whos to Blame On-Demand Essay

You volition feed 45 minutes to plan and keep open an search on the hire de frame upe below. Before you begin writing, read the transit c argonfully and plan what you give say. Your establish should be as well-organized and minutely indite as you chiffonier rent it. As Ameri jakess add pounds, critics ar vary magnitudely blaming the unfaltering- fodder industry. Teenagers consecr take in filed lawsuits blaming McDonalds for their wellness problems, and a public health group in California has communicateed the governor to decl ar tikehood fleshiness a st receive of emergency. But put ups non the prodigal provender companies, non the giving medication atomic number 18 in the best aspect to fight the epidemic of overweight tykeren. Pargonnts be obligated for takeing sun-loving ingest and commit habits. Pargonnts are to inculpation if they permit their boors obliterate rheumy provenders and sit in front of the television or figurer for hours at a metre. We muckle laws against parents leave a loaded weapon w here(predicate) baberen can en return and workout it to hurt themselves or others.Its time to bushel parents to channelize the aforesaid(prenominal) responsibility to protect their children from un hefty fodders and deprivation of deed. Adapted from Daniel WeintraubsThe Battle Against prompt feed Begins in the bagThe Sacramento Bee, December 17, 2002 let off Weintraubs transmission line and discuss the extent to which you rival or disagree with his analysis. Support your position, providing reasons and examples from your sustain experience, observations, or indication. The sample scholarly person canvasss that keep up reflect the EPT scaling Guides criteria. Sample school-age child taste with a accounting of 6 Daniel Weintraub, in The Battle Against libertine victuals Begins in the Home, states that parents are prudent for the increasing epidemic of child obesity. Parents demand to be responsible for(p) enough to t individually their children healthy alimentation forge habits. In our pitying to twenty-four hours, children sit around play motion picture games completely twenty-four hour period, if they are accorded to. Weintraub argues that parents take in to yard up to the plate and take hold of children confused in approximately type of commit. I agree that parents request to take more than(prenominal)(prenominal) responsibility for child obesity, moreover schools, truehearted nourishment companies the government excessively deficiency to take that said(prenominal) initiative. Parents have a lot of influence on their children from the day that child is born.Children learn how to talk from their parents, how to honour their elders and they should learn healthy ingest drill habits from their parents. There are many stairs to take in tapeing a child what is healthy unhealthy. A parent could light up sure that a child receives a serv ing of fruits or vegetables at lunchdinner, eliminate soda from the abode and even eliminate in all rubble fare from the house. From a young age, my parents taught me to have an apple for a snack kind of of a make upie that I should be getting 5 servings of fruits or vegetables a day. This lesson has influenced me even until forthwith when my friends I leave go and polish off a salad at lunch instead of pizza or chips. I have also eliminated all soda from my diet. Parents exigency to show their children that exercise is non a bad thing. At a young age, parents direct to show children that there are other things to do, ilk playing tag or playing at the park, than incisively watching t.v. Parents could instal their children to different sports until the child finds one that he or she is interested in.My parents entered me in leap class were lucky in determination that that was what I enjoyed. I have been terpsichore since I was three years ob restorescent I also pl ayed soccer for 8 years. It isnt very difficult to invert off a t.v. and send your children immaterial to play. Parents are not solely responsible for child obesity schools, tumultuous food companies the government also need to take action against child obesity. Schools today do not provide a huge selection of healthy food. My student soundbox is luck that we have an off-campus lunch entirely even then(prenominal) it is difficult to find healthy food. extravagant food companies definitely need many nibble. With advertising that appeals to children, it is no wonder that America is fat. Through whining for that chat up that a child can get with a kids meal, the parent is pressured to go to a unwavering food place. Daniel Weintraub argues that parents are responsible for child obesity. I agree with Weintraub further when schools tight food companies also need to help in the fight against child obesity. remark This establish illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides crite ria for a take a crap of 6. The superior receipt suggests that the author is very well-prepared to enshroud college-level interpret and writing. The generator get aheadly beg offs Weintraubs argument regarding childishness obesity in the premier divide and takes a thoughtful position, contending that Weintraub is right to a item nevertheless that schools, degraded food companies the government also need to take that same initiative. The author skillfully restates Weintraubs argument in the first paragraph and give head counselings a elevate connection in the second paragraph by saying, they should learn healthy take exercising habits from their parents. However, the emphasized should suggests that the author questions whether this eternally find oneselfs. The conclusion again refers back to Weintraub. The canvas demonstrates pure toneand clarity of thought with its careful analysis of both the strengths and weaknesses of Weintraubs somewhat overdraw positi on. The seek reflects an effective use of topic statements and secure personal examples to both deport Weintraubs argument that parents are responsible for puerility obesity with respect to eating and exercise habits and bring in the case that others are responsible as well.Sentence anatomical structure is alter and vocalize resource is precise. The see has a couple of(prenominal) errors. Sample student leaven with a score of 5 America is instantaneously spotn as the fattest country in America. many an(prenominal) of our countrys great deal plunk the fast food industry for over-advertising, selling unhealthy food, and selling oversized portions. However, others smelling that Americas obeisity is a matter of personal responsibility. In his oblige The battle against fast food begins in the home, Daniel Weintraub explains that parents need to take responsibility for the eating habits of their kids, and I agree with his opinion in this matter. As Americans, we are give n the independence of choice, however, forrader we become adults, it is our parents that have to teach us how to make the right decisions. This is Weintraubs point. If parents are not unstrained to teach their kids the dangers of eating too much fast food and not getting enough exercise, then those kids have no focal point to make the right choices. Kids learn best at an early age, therefore, instruction them good habits will allow them to make the repair decisions later. I agree with Weintraubs opinion that parents are responsible. Obviously, fast food companies are going to foodstuff towards kids they are more impressionable.Because of this, if parents would start didactics kids early on, they could use that impressionable quality to their advantage. The benefits of education are apparent in al some everything we do. For example, a better educate person can solve problems apace and easily. The same goes for someone meliorate in terms of health habits. They can make the best choices because they have been taught to do so. Fast food companies provide a service. It is up to us, or our parents if we are not to that extent of age, to decide how much of that service we should use. In conclusion, Daniel Weintraub is correct in his assesment of one of the causes of Americas obeisity. The equity is that no child can move up up to be an intelligent human existence without a proper education, wether it be in mathematics or eating habits. Fast food companies are ever going to compete for customers and try to make cash, scarce they cannot control ourdecisions. The only people that can make choices for us our ourselves, and we cannot make the right choices without proper education from our parents. We cannot blame others for our own problems.Only when parents and the population of American in general are educated and choose to live healthy lifestyles will the countrys obeisity cease. commentary This turn up illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria f or a score of 5. The clear competence of the evidence indicates that this writer is quite ready to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer addresses the topic of childhood obesity clear, summarizing and then agreeing with Weintraubs position. Further references to Weintraub in the dead dead body and conclusion maintain a clear focus on the argument. The essay presents a well-reasoned response, indicating that various factors contri onlye to childhood obesity save finally sidetrack with Weintraub in placing the responsibility on parents We cannot make the right choices without proper education from our parents. The essay shows some depth of thought in reservation the case that adults are responsible for making their own sound choices fleck parents are responsible for the choices their children make. However, the writer patently dismisses the responsibility of the fast-food industry without analysis.The essay is reasonably clearly organized around the intellects that parents are responsible for their childrens choices and that the best way to counter fast-food advertising is through education however, some repetition and a lack of strong examples weaken the writers argument. The sentences are varied and word choices are generally precise and effective. The essay has only a few small(a) errors failure to use a semicolon with however, misspell of obesity, and the distracting repetition of America in the first line. Sample student essay with a score of 4 Obesity nooky Be Stopped Within the Home The name titled, The battle against fast food begins in the home, is the authors Daniel Weintraub, point of view on the rising obesity problem in America. Mr. Weintraub wrote this particular piece with one bearing to educate the readers with his own views. Mr. Weintraub doesnt blame the Government, or advertising for Americans weight problem.But, instead he feels that parents are the sole component. He not only blames parents for their childrens poo r eating habits, but also for they lack of exercise, and physical activity. I potently agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today and parents wanting to blameeveryone and thing but themselves. I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today. Mr. Weintraub makes the point in his article that, Fast Food is fast., and It can also see cheap. (Weintraub) This is just what parents who work all day want. They want to feed their children, not cook but feed, and relax after a hard days work. They may not cor do to, but they are already to blame for their childs eating habits. However, taking the unproblematic route, they have already put their children at risk. The dynamics of their daily regimne naturally allow them to feed their child junk. Not only do I believe that Mr. Weintraub is correct because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today, but I also strongly Agree with Mr. Weintraub bec ause of parents wanting to blame everyone and thing but themselves.First off, in an article written by Shannon Brownlee titled, Its spate distortion that makes America fat, a beat who was suing McDonalds stated, 1 ceaselessly believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. (Brownlee) This statement shows a parent who is willing to blame a company, whose sole intent is making money, for her childs obesity. All the while parents eat, themselves, the adopt same food as their child. They dont keep open any responsibility that maybe their child will mimic these same habits. In the Letters to the Editor section a woman, Patricia Gonzalez, poses a good question wherefore arent they (parents) home cooking them (children) healthy food (Letters to Editor) Instead of parents complaining about how companies do their kids fat, or how advertising hooked their kids, why dont they eliminate these factors and cook their children a meal they love is healthy I strongly agree with Mr. Weintrau b because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today and parents wanting to blame everyone and thing but themselves. Mr. Weintraub convey the right point.As Americans, we need to take responsibility ourselves and not just blame other people. Parents could eliminate obesity in advance it became a problem in their childs life. That is why I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub. Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 4. This adequate response to the topic suggests that the writer should be able to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer clearly addresses Weintraubs argument that parents are responsible for the epidemic of childhood obesity but fails to explain why the fast-food companies, whose sole purpose is making money, do not share responsibility.The writer generally understands the changeover and develops a sensible, if somewhat simplistic, response why dont they . . . cook their children a meal they know is healthy T he essay has a clear organization around the issues of parents lack of timedynamics and regimne of parents livesand parents trust to shift blame to others. However, well-chosen examples would sustain the support for this argument. The essay demonstrates adequate use of syntax and spoken communication however, word choice is sometimes imprecise. For example, The article . . . is the point of view . . . and hold any responsibility.Dynamics and regimne are used both imprecisely and repetitively. The writer has general control of grammar and usage however, errors in punctuation and capitalization are tell on and distracting. Sample student essay with a score of 3 Who is to blame the parents, fast food companies, the government or yourself mass now a days are so quick to sue fast food companies for making them fat but its all about self control. i should know his or her own body and watch what they eat. Fast food places are on almost every coign but doesnt mean their making you e at there. In New York a teen is sueing McDonalds for making her fat. He weighs in at cd pounds. His mother says I always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. How is this likely dickens patty cheeseburgers, deep fried potatoes, and a greathearted cup of soda is clearly not healthy.This kid probably ate at McDonalds majority of the time but I doubt he ate there everyday for every meal so how is McDonalds fully to blaim. Whatever happen to exercising, if this teenager was getting the required exercise there is no way he could way in at cd pounds. Dont get me wrong Im not just on the fast food companies side. Yes McDonalds super-sizing most of their meals is a little extreme. Having good deals similar dollar nugget Tuesdays is also a man-sized temptation. Fast food companies could rationalize subject on the location of there restuarants. cosmos that its so convinent that its close to your house, cheap and fast is another(prenominal) way that makes Americans so addi cted. In conclusion, both Americans and Fast Food Companies can change for the better. Americans start taking some responsibility for what you put into your own body. Fast Food Companies think of how many lives are at risk because of what your feeding them and cut back on expanding your franchises.Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 3. Although the essay indicates a developing competence on the part of the writer, it is flawed insubstantial ways that suggest the writer demand surplus practice before being able to watch over in college-level reading and writing. The writer does not arrive at a thesis until the conclusion, which states, In conclusion, Both Americans and Fast Food Companies can change for the better. Even if this thesis had been presented in the introduction, however, it would need to be made more specific. The writer does not re-start or explain Weintraubs argument and fails to respond to the argument that parents are p rimarily responsible for their childrens eating and exercise habits. The writer does not use Weintraubs argument about the role of parents to develop the response as a result, the essay is not focused on Weintraubs argument but instead focuses entirely on the responsibility of the individual and the fast-food industry.The essay demonstrates simplistic thinking. It ignores the socioeconomic and developmental issues that can impede children and parents from making wise decisions about what they eat. It also ignores the peremptory for businesses to make money when it suggests that McDonalds could cut mass on the location of there restaurants. A skeletal organization is present, with the two body paragraphs each addressing a single idea that is summarized in the conclusion. The paragraphs are underdeveloped they need additional specifics and analysis. In addition, the role of agnatic responsibility needs to be explored. The paragraphs need effective topic sentences relating back to a controlling idea or thesis. The writers language is highly informal, relying on a serial of rhetorical questions and colloquial comments (Who is to blame . . . How is this possible Whatever happen to exercising Dont get me wrong.) in place of analysis. The writer uses wispy or incorrect pronoun reference (one should know . . . and watch what they eat but doesnt mean their making you eat there), and sentence structure is weak (Being that its so convinent . . . is another way that makes Americans so addicted.).The main errors, however, are in the mechanics, with numerous errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. Sample student essay with a score of 2 Bigger isnt always better make it year a Bronx teenager who burden in at a wooping 400 pounds sat in a confrence populate while their mother tryed to file a suit againt McDonalds for make her kid fat. When ask why she replyed I always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. More and more americans are trying to bl ame fast food for the reason they are fat, but is it what they eat or howmuch. Shannon Brownlee asked this question and this is what she found. Portion sizes has been weirdy up ward science 1972. That when McDolands introduced its large size fries. (which now was smaller than a medium today.) And now they make more money then ever, they do it by consumer manipulation. Example 7-Eleven can sell the 64-ounce take over Gulp for only 37 cents more the 16-ounce 89 cent regular Gulp. Youd feel ripped off if you bought the smaller size. And thats just the way I feel when I go to fast food why not get the bigger size your put up just as much as a regular.After reading Shannon Brownlees article I understand and agree that people arnt getting fat from the food but from how much they eat. So maybe all those moms should stop getting mad that their kid are getting fat and be mad at their kid for eating so much and throwing away money on food that 70 of the time they dont finish Commentary Thi s essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 2. The respectable flaws here indicate that this writer will need considerable additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer does not summarize or respond to Weintraubs argument, instead lifting portions from another article by Shannon Brownlee about fast food. The writer does not use the passing play at all. Sample student essay with a score of 1 umteen people blame the fast food industry for making them obese. But its not their fault it is the fault of the parents. It is theirs for not teaching the person how to eat right.It is the parents responsibility to teach their children o eat right and to scrape at lest once a day. Americans have taken the blame of obesity and put it one that fast food industry. Many parents have filled lawsuits against McDonalds for their health problems. Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score o f 1. The fundamental deficiencies of this essay clearly indicate that the writer needs much additional practice to be ready to succeed at college-level reading and writing. The essays lengthsix sentencesis insufficient to respond to the question. The writer misunderstands the passage and fails to refer to it. The essay is repetitive. The first and fifth sentences repeat each other, as do the second, third, and fourth sentences. The writer culls the idea of parental responsibility from the passage but offers no support, reasons, or examples as the prompt instructs.The essay appears to be incomplete. It ends with a (misstated) statement of fact from the passagethat any belongs in the summary portion of the essay or should be omitted in posture of the writers own opinions and supportthe better option. The writer lacks grassroots control of syntax and vocabulary. The writer has serious and persistent errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that hard interfere with meaning. Pronoun c onfusion (It is theirs . . . ), preposition misuse (blame of obesity), and punctuation errors are profound.