Compare between the three models of international human rights Essay

Compargon amidst the three models of outside(a) human race reforms (statist, cosmopolitan, and internationalist) base on the streng - Essay ExampleThe major issues that these theories seek to address include civil wars, conflict prevention as well as resolution. Humanitarian interventions which defecate not been fully explored as far as human rights models are concerned .However it is an area that greatly provides strong themes as far as human rights models are concerned. Statism is one of the models that are very important as far as human rights are concerned in the international regime. low this model, it is the responsility of the nation to ensure that human rights are adhered to. This model is equal to that of internationalist and cosmopolitanism2. They both hold to the treaties of universal declaration of human rights universalism. The treaty states that all nations should ensure that the ineluctably of their citizens are met. This model has one weakness it is the stat e that takes precedence before any human right can be recognized. Never the less, statism is seen as the most appropriate as far as issues regarding government are concerned.Statism has also resulted into stronger states harassing weaker ones.Therefore,as much as statist is an international regime that looks at the rights of citizens, internationalism and cosmopolitanism looks at the offbeat of citizens of a nation with more than statism Statism is very conservative. As a result, it leads to impassivity in debates regarding humanitarian interventions. ... The simply challenge is that it does not fully support interventions as is seen in cosmopolitanism and internationalism. internationality model on the other(a) hand corresponds to international theory. Internationalism and statist acknowledge that states are central as well as sovereign. Internationalism further focuses on how relations between states are regulated by international communal practices.3 This conniption is not w ell manifested in statism.Statists are greatly oppose states that that encourage good relations between member states. As a result, they dont suck up feeling for war victims or nations that have witnessed serious crimes against humanity. According to internationalists, if the recipient state authorizes an intervention, they highly encourage it.Statism on the other hand does not fully welcome interventions .However, both statism and internationalism were used during the First World War and are soothe applicable today. In exceptional cases, statism allows interventions especially a government collapses. All the three models of human rights smell major challenges. For example, they have to be approved by a national government of any sylvan before they can be applied to any nation.Thus the main priority in both cases is the rights the states have as far as any law is concerned4. Thereafter, the issues of human rights as far as international laws are concerned then follow later. This comparable conclusions means that there is no major balance in relation to some issues of international contexts. Cosmopolitanism is also a human right model that issued worldwide. Under this model, the international system looks keenly to the factors that affect individual members