Racial profiling is not beneficial despite expert's findings Term Paper

Racial write is not beneficial despite experts findings - Term Paper ExampleIt suggests that pen undermines social cohesion, is unjust, and should be stopped. gate Racial pen is a controversial subject that is increasingly on the minds of both minorities and the law. This is a greens practice by which people of a certain ethnic background argon targeted by the pledge apparatus on the belief that they ar more likely to commit or be entangled in illegal activity. There is no other probable suspicion except for their skin colour, and because of it they are subject to search or however detention. There are some that suggest this ineluctably to be done in order to protect our security and to cut down on costs. However, racial profiling is inherently unjust and unAmerican. It is not a useful or acceptable practice and it may even have negative consequences for security. Background To properly understand the role played by racial profiling in the criminal justice system it is im portant to take a step back and manner at the various theories that underlie the system we live in. There are deuce main models that are used to frame the criminal justice system. These two models are excellent illustrations of the thinking behind a great deal of the policy discussion relating to racial profiling. The first model is called the Due Process model. In this system, the standard to arrest and convict a person is very high. There are numerous safeguards in place to ensure that no innocent person is ever subject to any sort of encroaching(a) treatment. Everyone, no matter what the crime or the nature of the evidence, is treated with kid gloves. Not until the judge weighs in with the final conviction is the suspect sent to prison. Trials, under this model, last for a very long period and every scrap of evidence is reviewed. The problem with this model is that it is impracticable. It is very expensive and time consuming. It uses up a lot of resources in a system with limi ted or finite resources already. It may also go for guilty people to game the system to some extent. This system is often promoted by people on the left of the political spectrum. There is a second model called the Crime Control model. Under this system, the police have a great deal of power to act as they see fit. They are empower to stop people without suspicion and hold people without charge. The prosecutors are usually presumed to be right. The presumption of pureness is somewhat limited. There are few protections regarding the civil rights of those accused under this model. An accusation is similar to a conviction. Trials and investigations are short everything is aligned against the suspect. Suspicion is akin to guilt. Criminals have few rights and little evidence needs to be presented in order to convict someone. This model is often promoted by people on the right. These two models are good illustrations of the politics behind racial profiling. They also represent two pole s, neither of which are an appropriate way to run a criminal justice system. We see that racial profiling move into the Crime Control model, where suspects have fewer rights, but community security is the ultimate good. Preserving limited resources is important. alternatively than randomly searching people, under racial profiling ethnic background is taken to imply a likely disposition to commit a crime or type of crime. Race is used as an investigative shortcut. This is an unfortunate extreme. A much better position is between the two models. Problems with Racial write There are many possible reasons why