Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Ethics - Essay ExampleThis paper discusses the virtue surmise, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics unneurotic with a soulal experience that explains the relationship between virtue, value, and moral concepts. The Theories and Their Approach in Addressing Ethics and devotion Virtue theory The virtue theory is one of the applicable theories in determining morality of an act. The theory bases morality on a persons character and not on intention or possible results of his or her actions. Admirable characteristics of an individual define morality within social systems. The theory however defines character as peoples demonstrated demeanoral tendencies and classifies a persons behavior as moral if such behavior is admirable among members of the parliamentary procedure and promotes social cohesion. Further, the behavior must cheer rationality in peoples actions that need to be free from selfishness and bias. Virtue ethics in addition avoids extremes. It is, however, criticized for its high-level variability across societies (Brook & Dunn, 2009). Utilitarianism Utilitarianism, however, focuses on the intent to maximize utility, and is based on beneficence doctrine. This authority a promotion of what is good and voidance of all sorts of action that can cause harm to former(a) people. In either of its forms, whether act utilitarianism or rule utilitarianism, the theory identifies a persons pauperism and considers morality when an action causes more benefits that harm. Act utilitarianism measures morality in terms of results of an act of omission or commission while rule utilitarianism relies on set rules of ethics, which regulate acts for beneficence, to come up morality. Utilitarianism can also be explored from philosophical perspectives that include welfarism, consequentialism, mass and maximizing (Kanniyakonil, 2007, p. 66). Welfarism focuses on the societys well being, consequentialism focuses on impacts of actions, and aggregative aspect comp atomic number 18s levels of good or bad that an action elicits. These approaches apply either singularly or dependently to determine morality in an act (Kanniyakonil, 2007). Deontology Deontology is another approach to determining morality. It is based on moral rules and obligations to do right in the society and its general scope defines an act as moral when a person fulfils an obligation. It, however, disregards consequences of such actions. Failing to honor an obligation with the aim of promoting good, and even achieving the desired objective, defines immorality. There exist twain types of deontology act deontology and rule deontology (Kanniyakonil, 2007, p. 60). Act deontology requires that a person evaluate all factors around a spotlight before making a decision based on direct or implied obligations. Rule deontology, however, pre-establishes standards upon which obligations are derived (Kanniyakonil, 2007). Similarities Among the Theories The major similarity among the three concep ts is their objective of determining and consequently ensuring morality. They all establish bases for evaluation and motley of peoples advances as moral or immoral, ethical or unethical. Further, deontology and utilitarianism are similar in their mode of approach. They both apply action and rules to determine morality. Applicability of all the theories also varies from one society to another based on cultural values. Their strict application in one setup may, therefore, not correspond to application in another setup (Brook & Dunn, 2009 Kanniyakonil,